Why Yes, I Would Like Some Star Trek With My Lens Flair

Monday, May 11th, 2009 at 10:03 am by Jamie

Star Trek

The future is so bright, you gotta wear shades.

If you’re one of those people who thinks that there just isn’t enough lens flair in today’s movies, the latest Star Trek more than makes up for that. The lens flair is omnipresent, almost a character itself. There are times where it demands so much attention that it washes out the other actors on screen. And yet, I wasn’t horribly bothered by the copious amounts of lens flair. It somehow worked.

REEEEMIX

Star Trek exceeded all of my expectations. I was initially very very skeptical of this reboot. The trailers did a great job of winning me over, but I still had some reservations. I thought that I would just hate young Kirk. The trailers paint him in a smug and arrogant light. But after only a few minutes of screen time with this version of Kirk, I was totally hooked. The young cast breathes new life into these characters. It’s a refreshing interpretation and a true joy to see them in action. Zachary Quinto’s Spock is more internally conflicted and nuanced than Leonard Nimoy’s version ever was. Chris Pine’s Kirk is just as brash and bold as you’d expect, but there’s an added layer of gravitas and seriousness that William Shatner was rarely able to capture.

Though this is clearly Kirk and Spock’s movie, for the most part the supporting cast gets their moment to shine. Karl Urban’s “Bones” watches Kirk’s back as best he can. Zoe Saldana’s Uhura provides an emotional anchor for the otherwise logical Spock. Anton Yelchin’s enthusiastic Chekov saves the day with his technical knowhow. Simon Pegg’s Scotty works his miracles and steals every scene he’s in. And John Cho’s Sulu has a foldy ninja sword. Hmm… Now that I think on it, Sulu gets the least amount of development of all the bridge crew. We learn about him is that he’s a trained fence and occasionally forgets to take the parking break off when he’s piloting star ships. I was slightly disappointed that we didn’t get more Sulu, but it wasn’t a glaring enough oversight that would ruin the movie for me. I loved the new cast and look forward to seeing more of them.

As for Nero, he’s the best kind of villain, the kind that you can sympathize with even if he’s utterly mad. He saw his entire race obliterated. Who among us, if given the opportunity, wouldn’t want to make things right? We can hardly blame Nero or expect him to simply forgive. Part of us cheers him on. For me, that’s always a winning villain formula.

Time is Herb That Cures All Diseases

The only way to fit this movie into established continuity is to wipe it all away with time travel. It works well, but there are points where I felt it got a little too Deus Ex Machina. Not in a Starbuck is a “well I don’t fucking know and I won’t bother explaining it ever even though I wrote the damn character” kind of way. But the whole transwarp transport bit smelled slightly of bullshit. It’s a big cheat. It fits, but it’s a cheat. Scotty’s intro was also a bit too convenient. I still think Simon Pegg is a great scene stealer, but I kinda smirked at these scenes.

Kirk running away from Cloverfield on Hoth was a bit much. We’ve never really seen giant monster chase scenes in any other incarnation of Trek and it just felt a little out of place. Loved the creature designs, but I was wondering how a giant monster movie crossed over into Trek. Still, it is a giant freaking monster and that’s mostly always a cool thing.

I also felt that the scenes with Old Spock were a touch too sentimental for my tastes. But that’s a personal thing. It worked somehow, but it could have been done differently.

To Boldly Go

Overall, I loved Star Trek. Audrey and I walked out of the theater with big stupid gins on our faces. It’s been a good damn while since a movie made us both that happy. She’s now a new Star Trek fan and is looking forward to what this new crew has in store for us. For me, it’s reignited the flame of fandom. I have such optimistic hope for the future of Star Trek. It’s renewed my faith in my fandom.

Highly recommended for all movie goers. If it can win over my wife who is neither a sci fi nor a Star Trek fan it’s a damn fine movie.

16 Responses to “Why Yes, I Would Like Some Star Trek With My Lens Flair”

  1. AvatarJeff
    1

    My mother, whom I went to see the movie with for Mother’s day, is neither a Trekkie nor a sci-fi nerd. She has immediately placed this film into her top five movies OF ALL TIME.

    ’nuff said. I loved it, thought it was fantastic (I am also not a Trekkie) and thought that THIS is how you restart a franchise. all other restarts look to this movie on how it is DONE. Just enough bones thrown to the hardcore nerds to give them fan wanks, while making it accessible to everyone else.

    Bravo, J.J.

  2. AvatarDaVincisGhost
    2

    I was a little uneasy about the idea of Karl Urban as Bones until I saw the movie. Two minutes into his screen time and I almost forgot that it wasn’t a young DeForest Kelley. The same goes for Simon Pegg as Scotty. Plus seeing a version of Admiral Pike back before he was a drooling quadriplegic with a brain bug in his head was a nice touch. A bit of the story explanations and tie ins seemed a wee bit convenient, but none of it bothered me while watching it. Now I’ve got to watch Wrath of Khan again to see if JJ’s take on Trek outdoes my all time favorite Trek movie.

  3. AvatarJami
    3
    Author Comment

    Oh man, it’s hard to beat Khan. That movie was just so balls to the wall!

  4. AvatarHenry
    4

    What are you talking about? Sulu totally kicked ASS! He got to save the day, not once but TWICE!

    I was in Wal-Mart the other day and I got all pissed off because despite the two sizes of new Sulu action figures, neither one came with a sword!

  5. AvatarFmF
    5

    You also learn things from it.Like never buy used time machines.

  6. AvatarCharmCityShinobi
    6

    J.J. Abrams was actually asked about all the lens flares in an interview, since the early footage and trailers were littered with them. He basically said that he felt the future would be super shiny, with flashing lights and being out in space and all that. All of those lens flares were produced in camera, none were post-production. It was a hassle at times trying to get the light just right, but he’s happy with how it visually came out.

    I think he did a great job, as well as all the actors, paying homage to the original but not trying to just imitate. They each gave their own interpretation of the characters, and I’m interested to see where they go next. According to some reports, J.J. and cast are already signed up for two more.

  7. AvatarJami
    7
    Author Comment

    I think a trilogy sounds just about right. Nothing sucks worse than something awesome sticking around too long.

  8. AvatarRichard "Pocky" Kim
    8

    More now, please.

    This movie was an excellent piece of film, and I’m looking forward to the sequel and the Blu-Ray release.

    As for Sulu - I think he got a reasonable amount of air time, but he needed more lines (just a few, though).

  9. AvatarDave
    9

    I agree with you on most points except the one about the chase on ‘hoth’ (as you call it ^_^). While Star Trek has always had a lot of aliens (intelligent) but never enough aliens (beasts), I mean with all the wild places they go I always thought that was something that was missing.

  10. AvatarHamstadini
    10

    I shall offer a counterpoint.

    I saw this movie yesterday, and I can see why people would call this “the ‘best’ since Wrath of Kahn.” WoK was just mindless action, and the remake was just as mindless, if not more so. Sure, the characterization of the cast was great, but other than that?

    The fantastic thing about Star Trek movies is that they make you think. The Voyage Home talked about endangered species. Undiscovered Country talked about hatred, and making peace with enemies. Insurrection talked about the search for eternal youth. But this? In order: Spacefight, fistfight, fistfight, fistfight, chase, fistfight, gunfight… well, you get the idea.

    Where was the intellect? Heck, where was the temporal Starfleet? You know they would have stepped in and kept the timeline intact. But the people behind this, they were so intent on doing this nouveau Trek that they threw all that out the window.

    On a final note, before I get too long-winded: what is Star Trek without an intellectual lesson? The answer: just another Star Wars.

  11. AvatarHenry
    11

    Hamstadini, please shove that giant load of crap back up the rectal orifice you just pulled it out of. Wrath of Khan “was just mindless action”? What the &*%$ movie did YOU see? Did someone show you something else and TELL you it was Wrath of Khan?

    WoK was about getting old, about facing death, about dealing with the ghosts of your past. Also, if you PAY ATTENTION to the action scenes, you’ll see HOW Kirk beats Khan despite the fact that Khan is much more intelligent. There are several major points there that you clearly missed. There’s more there about the Cold War, but that’s peppered throughout all of Star Trek and if you’ve missed that, I question your ability to analyze anything.

    This new movie is about parent issues. It’s also about how people deal with loss: Nero, Kirk and both Spocks. But, I think that it was mainly about the fact that what made Kirk and Spock great is their relationship with one another. Each one brings out the best in the other. There’s probably more there, but I’ve only seen the thing once.

  12. AvatarHamstadini
    12

    I take issue with a movie, and you throw personal insults, Henry? Nice quality there. I assumed that Star Trek fans were above the diatribe that Star Wars fans try to pull to defend their movies; once again I assumed wrong.

    Yes, you’re right that one of the talking points of WoK was about getting old; but the battle between Kahn and Kirk was so inflated that it eclipsed the point you were trying to make. How many times did Kirk mention getting old? Once? Twice? And how much time was spent on the Kirk/Kahn conflict?

    I don’t care how Kirk beat Kahn. When in my lifetime am I going to command a starship against a genetically engineered supergenius? I don’t care about what they did in the rehash between Kirk and Spock’s relationship, or how the CHARACTERS deal with loss. I wanted to see a story answering how WE should deal with it.

    What made Star Trek truly unique back in the day was that gave food for thought. It talked about issues that spanned present day and at the same time were universal - Racism, Environmentalism, Theology. None of that was shown here. And so, to me, it’s just another flashy Science Fiction movie.

  13. AvatarHenry
    13

    Dude, you’re hilarious! I didn’t actually attack any of personal “quality” of yours. I attacked your crappy argument and your observations. Attacking an argument and someone’s actions is not the same as a personal attack. You just took it personally. Maybe I should have thrown a smiley face up there, but I didn’t.

    You said that WoK was “just mindless action” and then admitted that it talked about getting older. You contradicted your own argument! Kirk mentioned getting old once or twice? Maybe, I wasn’t counting, but the theme and events related to that theme are peppered throughout the film. It’s just not blatantly obvious; it’s kind of subtle.

    You said you didn’t care about how Kirk beat Khan. You also said about the new Trek that you didn’t care about how the characters dealt with loss, you wanted to see how “WE should deal with it.” DUDE! If you pay attention to how Kirk beat Khan, you would LEARN SOMETHING that you can apply to life! And that really wasn’t all that subtle! I’m dyin’ over here! =)

  14. AvatarMcDucky
    14

    Children, children … man, come on fankids, let’s not get into throwing insults.

    Hamstadini said:
    “I don’t care how Kirk beat Kahn. When in my lifetime am I going to command a starship against a genetically engineered supergenius? I don’t care about what they did in the rehash between Kirk and Spock’s relationship, or how the CHARACTERS deal with loss. I wanted to see a story answering how WE should deal with it.”

    Being old enough to have grown up watching TOS like 90 billion times, Star Trek has - and always will be - about the characters FIRST, and the Hippy lovefest message SECOND. The very first Star Trek episode has Spock emotionally frustrated about Kirk taking over, Bones’ dislike for Spock, and over time, their friendship develops into this nice three triangle of buddies. Every character - including Sulu and Chekov - is developed. Look at In Search of Spock FFS. It’s not our story - it’s THEIRS.

    It wasn’t until the hokey later 80’s flicks that Star Trek goes overboard with the grand environmental/theological messages and makes it the PIVOTAL point of the story. Because that gave both Shatner and Nimoy and the rest of the cast the ability to be campy since the character development doesn’t matter anymore.

    The biggest atrocity in TOS Star Trek history is Undiscovered Country. That is possibly the WORST obvious message: END XENOPHOBIA (or racism). The plot was full of holes, the characters were mere cut-outs of their deeper selves, the action was campy and cheesy, and the production values were HORRIBLE. Worst of all, it was merely made to smooth out the transition between Next Generation and the Original Series. It’s as bad as that attempt they called Enterprise.

  15. Pingback Pingback:
    15
    Geek Entertainment News and Commentary - Angry Zen Master

    […] Chris Hemsworth, who we know as George Kirk in Star Trek, may play the God of Thunder in Kenneth Branagh’s adaptation of Marvel’s interpretation of Thor. That’s a mouthful. […]

  16. Pingback Pingback:
    16
    Geek Entertainment News and Commentary - Angry Zen Master

    […] Now, it’s not impossible to please fans with a completely new take on something as is evidenced by the latest Trek. But I’d say they have a much harder row to hoe with Buffy. Nemesis and Enterprise killed Trek fandom for a few years. Buffy fandom has yet to really have a cataclysmic thing of badness (okay, so the last season was only saved with a truly amazing finale, but still, not as bad as Enterprise). […]

Close
E-mail It